Resilience is the ability to stay capable of acting under pressure and to recover from setbacks, and it can be learned. The HOLD model of the Leadership Institute Wien, known in German as the HALT model, brings together the four protective factors that are best supported by research: Headspace (how I think), Ownership (where I have an effect), Letting go (how I recover) and Dependable relationships (who holds me). If you have HOLD, you keep your footing in a storm.
What resilience is, and what it is not
Resilience is often misunderstood: as toughness, as invulnerability, or as an innate talent that you either have or do not. Research paints a different picture. The developmental psychologist Ann Masten calls resilience “ordinary magic”. It does not come from extraordinary qualities, but from everyday abilities and relationships that can be learned.
Three things resilience is expressly not: it is not a permanent state. The same leader can be stable in one phase of life and exhaustible in another. It is not an endurance test. Anyone who simply suppresses strain pays for it later. And it is not an individual achievement. Nobody is resilient alone.
Why we do not use an off-the-shelf model of pillars
Anyone looking for resilience will find models with three, five, seven or ten pillars. The honest answer: there is no scientifically binding model of pillars. Most of these grids are didactic aids for structuring a topic, not a validated theory.
We therefore take the opposite route: not from the model to the factors, but from the evidence to the model. The HOLD model summarises what decades of peer-reviewed research have shown to be effective, and names it in a way that sticks in everyday leadership.
The four dimensions of the HOLD model
H for Headspace: how I think
It is not the event that creates the stress, but the way it is appraised. That is the core insight of the transactional stress model developed by Lazarus and Folkman. Whether a reorganisation is experienced as a threat or as a demanding task shapes the stress response. What can be trained is exactly this appraisal: recognising thought patterns that amplify stress, reframing situations, distinguishing what can be changed from what calls for acceptance. Martin Seligman’s research on explanatory style shows that people who classify setbacks as temporary and specific, rather than permanent and pervasive, stay confident and able to act.
O for Ownership: where I have an effect
Self-efficacy, the conviction that your own actions make a difference, has been one of the strongest known predictors of resilience and performance since Albert Bandura’s work. In everyday leadership, agency means recognising your own sphere of influence clearly, acting consistently within it and deliberately letting go outside it. That includes what may be the most underestimated leadership skill of all: saying no. Setting boundaries is not a question of character, but an action that can be practised.
L for Letting go: how I recharge
Strain does not do damage through its level, but through missing recovery. The work psychologist Sabine Sonnentag has shown that psychological detachment, genuinely switching off from work mentally, is one of the most effective protective factors against exhaustion. Anyone who stays mentally available in the evening and at the weekend recovers measurably less well. Recovery is therefore not a reward for performance, but a precondition for it: sleep, exercise, micro-breaks and rituals that turn the end of the working day into an actual end.
D for Dependable relationships: who holds me
The strongest finding in all resilience research is also the most human one: social connectedness protects. Julianne Holt-Lunstad’s meta-analysis of 148 studies shows that supportive relationships have a greater effect on health and life expectancy than many established medical risk factors. In a work context this means teams in which people can ask for and offer support without signalling weakness. Amy Edmondson calls that psychological safety, and such teams cope far better with pressure and change.
The quick self-check: what holds you?
Four questions for an initial assessment:
- H: Can I switch between several perspectives even under pressure, or does one thought take hold?
- O: Do I know what lies within my influence, and can I say no when enough is enough?
- L: Can I really switch off mentally after work?
- D: Are there people with whom I can raise what weighs on me, including professionally?
Where you hesitate is where your most effective starting point lies. That is exactly how we work in our resilience training: first the assessment, then the focus, instead of a watering can. For individual assessments we use validated instruments such as the Master Person Analysis (MPA).
Resilience in teams: why leadership makes the difference
Individual resilience carries you a long way, but in organisations it is leadership that decides whether it can grow. Leaders set the conditions for all four dimensions: they shape how setbacks are talked about (Headspace), how much real room for action remains (Ownership), whether being available after hours is the norm (Letting go) and whether asking for help counts as a strength (Dependable relationships). That is why the resilience training always combines both levels: personal tools for each individual and team agreements that actually change everyday work afterwards.
Resilience for your team or for you personally?
In a free initial consultation (30 minutes) we clarify where you stand and what really works.
→ Arrange a free initial consultation
Why self-regulation is not a wellness measure but a precondition for judgement: Wenn Führungskräfte nicht entscheiden.
Frequently asked questions about resilience and the HOLD model
Is resilience innate or learned?
Both play a part, but the trainable share is large. Research shows that resilience grows out of ordinary, learnable abilities: appraisal patterns, self-efficacy, recovery routines and relationships, not out of a rare talent.
How quickly does resilience training work?
First effects, for example through changed thought patterns or rituals for switching off, often show within a few weeks. Resilience becomes durable through practice, which is why we work with 30, 60 and 90 day action plans instead of one-off impulses.
What distinguishes the HOLD model from other resilience models?
It starts from the evidence, not from the grid: each of the four dimensions rests on its own peer-reviewed research. The model itself is communicated honestly as a didactic framework, and for individual assessments we use validated instruments.
What does resilience training do for my company?
Fewer stress-related absences, more stable performance through phases of change, and teams that cope with difficult messages and setbacks without tipping into cynicism or exhaustion. In lean organisations in particular, where every role counts, that is an investment in delivery capability.
Who is resilience training suitable for?
For leaders and teams who carry a lot of responsibility at high speed, ideally as prevention, before exhaustion becomes visible. Strong teams are not an argument against it, but the best starting point: prevention works best there.
